Home
profile
alyburns
User: [info]alyburns
Name: alyburns
calendar
Back December 2009
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
page summary
tags
alyburns' (aka sideburns & alyjude) Hiding Place - The Making of a Wank
If you spoke faster than David Hewlett you’d actually travel back in time - MS
alyburns
[info]alyburns
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
The Making of a Wank
Have you ever wondered how they really start? And how they get out of hand? Well, there's one going on right now and, oddly enough, it's very easy to track - to find out the truth. Very easy.

Before I start - I have to tell you - I'm naming names (I also took screenshots). I'm not pulling any punches. I expect fall-out and negativity. Maybe even some defriending - but I think this is important and I'm too old to worry about it. So here we go with the Great Beta Wank!

This particular wank stared with this post by [info]pinkyridz. She was upset with herself about her writing and shared that she'd decided not to write anymore. She took full blame , admitted to some bad habits, etc. even mentioned how she, "...received a lovely, supportive email, out lining where thing's were going wrong...." with a particular fic. As a result, she received over 50 comments to her post, including the first one which came from the infamous "Anonymous" - and turned out to be a rather 'pointed' response (I thought it was pretty harsh myself and have my suspicions about it) - which several others took offense to  (and of course some considered a flame). 

Following several supportive comments, someone stepped forward and claimed to be the individual who wrote the "....lovely, supportative email, out lining where things were going wrong...." - and that person was [info]annieb1955.

Admitting to being the beta seemed strange, especially considering the fact that [info]pinkyridz mentioned the "supportive email" only once and in passing. But [info]annieb1955 apparently felt the need to identify herself as the author of the 'supportive' email and said, "I don;t think anyone I've ever betaed for could ever say I've been mean or nasty when I've sent their corrections back and if this one disheartened you, I'm sorry about that. But writers really do need a thick skin."

Since no one had even mentioned being mean or nasty - or that she'd done anything wrong, this post struck me as very odd indeed.

Mostly, in [info]pinkyridz original post, she talked about how her son had problems in school translating their imagination to the written word and they were diagnosed as being mildly dsylexic. She went on to say that might have the same problem transferring her imagination to the written word as well. She never said she was dsylexic, only that she had all these ideas that couldn't transfer to paper.

The anonymous post got a bit huffy about that so [info]annieb1955 added yet another post where she said, oh, so thoughtfully, "Can I just point out that AM hasn't said she's been diagnosed with dyslexia? Just that she wonders if that might be the case. As the person who betaed her story I have to say that none of the errors struck me as those of a person with dyslexia so I'm hoping AM will feel relieved by that."

I'm sure AM ([info]pinkyridz) was, indeed, relieved at that expert opinion. And I know it was very nice of Annie when she added, "And can I just point out again, no one flamed AM. She was just overwhelmed by the beta I sent her back so if anyone's to blame it's me."

It was nice of her, because of course, [info]pinkyridz  never claimed to have been flamed. So of course, that statement got [info]pinkyridz all upset again because she thought she might have hurt Annie, so she responded with a lengthy post about how wonderful Annie was, ending with, "You are one of the nicest people in the fandomn and I am just so sorry that my decission has conincided with you looking at one of my stories :( Sending you tons of Love my friend."

To which Annie wrote - oddly, "Honey, I did offer to do the corrections for the grammar and typos for you and only highlight any phrasing changes. Unfortunately, what happened here is that people jumped to the conclusion that you said you are dyslexic and that you were being flamed or over criticized for your stories. However, it's done and behind us now. I'm moving on. Keep writing."

Actually - there was only one anonymous commentor and most of the posts were supportive and understanding and continually referred to that anonymous post as the problem post.  [info]pinkyridz took full responsibility for her writing faults. She never mentioned the beta by name, heck, she never mentioned the word 'Beta' - she said only that they'd tried to help her.

No, the only person who outed Annie as a beta, was Annie (she also repeated numerous times that [info]pinkyridz was never flamed - even to posts that mentioned nothing about flames and even after [info]pinkyridz said the same thing herself - over and over again.) Then Annie pointed out again, in no less than TWO posts (or more?) that she was the beta - in spite of the fact that she was NEVER the object of the original post!

So what happened next?

[info]annieb1955 posted on her own journal (even as she was still posting comments over at [info]pinkyridz journal) :   PAUSE:   I originally posted the actual wording, which was very bad of me - since it was a flocked post, so now you only get the gist: Which was that she expected gratitude instead of stating that you're leaving due to your beta. It was a very strange post coming on the heels of reading the other one.

Where on earth had that come from? Why would she post such a thing when NOTHING had been said against her? Of course, it did accomplish one thing, I suppose. It gave her a lot of sympathy and started a pretty nice wank. She soon had over 100 comments (most offering sympathy) but it was also apparent most of them didn't have knowledge of the facts or of the post that started it all. But isn't that normal? Unfortunately - yes. :( 

Then, over at [info]pinkyridz , she posted, one day later, as a comment to her original post, this heartwrenching comment: "Thank you my friend - but I think the time has come for me to bow out complettly. Lyn has kindly just sent me over Annie's LJ of replies and now I see that I have caused all sorts of upset that was so not my intention.
Some of the replies have been very hurtful. I don't consider myself to be an ungrateful bitch but am obviously considered on in the fandom. I want you,especially to know that this was nothing to do with Annie or the beta - it was me - just me, no one else and I am truly devestated that I am portrayed as such. You were right in your comment my friend - I am not in a good place at the momment and I really want you to understand that none of what happened had anything to do with how she feels about the incident. I am so not like the person they are talking about over there. I've had such a great time but now, as Lyn kindly pointed out, I have had some home truths that have hurt, especially from people I admire and think so highly of - so now I shall leave. I will post one more story here and then go. Bless you and good luck."


How thoughtful of Lyn (I have to assume it's Annie's sister, Lyn, who is [info]alynt on LJ - even though she's said she's not on LJ) to pass comments from a flocked post over to [info]pinkyridz . Truly the friendly thing to do, eh? Of course, [info]alynt managed more than a few comments on [info]pinkyridz post, starting, I believe, after the above 'farewell' post - including her own opinion that the Anonymous post wasn't bad at all, and of course, reminding [info]pinkyridz that, "Annie does an awesome job for me these days..." and, "gratefully accept the help your betas give you - and remember they graciously do this in their own time..."

Any chance to support the sister, eh? Not to mention reminding [info]pinkyridz how 'graciously' betas do their work. *knife digs in a bit deeper*

[info]alynt didn't stop there, oh, no. She furthered the whole misconception that was being perpetrated over on [info]annieb1955 's journal with this: "I think the problem for me was that you felt you had to announce you would no longer be writing and said it was due to the story you'd just got back, which was full of corrections. People then chose to read your comments as being that your betas had treated you badly and assured you that spelling and grammar don't matter. I'm sorry but as a fairly long-term writer, beta and reader, I have to say they do. It's fine for friends to be supportive, to tell you not to give up, but to tell you not to worry about trying to improve, is not, IMO, good advice."

Can we say - WTF? Sure we can. And [info]pinkyridz ? She just kept apologizing, like with a comment to the above: "Ah well *sigh* - I never viewed is as an announcement - I thougth I was being polite, didn't want to just disappear - ah well *sigh* - like I said - lesson learn't. I've read back the comments and don't see where people say that the beta's treated me badly at all?"

And [info]alynt 's response? "The very way you worded your comment was an announcement and you know it was. You're attempting to be coy and not pulling it off at all well in my book."

Well, that finally got an impassioned response from [info]pinkyridz : "You know - you and I have alway's butted heads over the years - I always expect you to totaly disagree with everything I say or do - never comes as a surprise - In fact I kinda would not be surprised if you left the first comment. Funny - I have never met you,commented about you in any way, would never dream of it.

The only person who knows the reason behind my post is - me. I'm not attempting to be anything - I never, never, ever said anything against Annie or her beta - you have created something that was not there and carried it on. I adore your sister and have been extremely grateful for her help and guidance.

You and I will always clash - but that's fine - it takes all sorts to make a world, we will always disagree - I say black - you say white - it will make no difference what we talk about - I don't know why? I know straight away when you post by your tone.
I adore your writing and passion and you have made such a wonderful contribution to the fandom and are so talented.

It is sad - never mind - we agree we disagree - I hope we agree that getting personal is not the way forward - we are grown women and I think we should try and curb our comments to each other as we trully don't know what it is like to walk in each other's shoes."

And what about the comments over at [info]annieb1955 's journal? Well, annieb1955 thought it would have been nice if she'd just given, "...a simple thanks instead of a dramatic exposition...."

Annie's sister thought, "Her comments and posts were a self-serving cry for attention and nothing more. Having seen - and helped - with the fic in question, I'm amazed at your perseverence and tact."

And when [info]pinkyridz  posted a comment to that - apologizing yet again, [info]alynt  wrote:
"I suggest you go read the first rant you wrote on your LJ, AM. You obviously have a short memory. It was that first post that had your friends up in arms over the nasty beta on your behalf. It was only a couple of days later that you hastened to assure them that your beta had been nothing but kind and helpful. Geez, despite the snarking going on at her, Annie still offered to beta more for you. It's a little late to protest that you said nothing wrong, were nothing but gracious after your original comments have stirred up a hornet's nest because your friends were so incensed on your behalf *because* of what you told them."

Amazing twisting of the facts.

And so it went, with friends weighing in because they believed [info]annieb1955  and her version.

It was like a high school experiment done in a philosophy class.

But this wank didn't end there - oh, no.

This post showed up - and while the individual has every right to tear a story apart in her own journal - the reason for it wasn't so hot. It was based on what she knew from - you guessed it - [info]annieb1955 - she even thanks her in the opening of her post and adds, "After betaing the unposted story, the writer had a hissy fit because she received a real beta instead of a soppy, cheerleading, ass-kissing response. She then pulled a Pepe and threatened to leave fandom because she got a "bad" beta."

Isn't that amazing? [info]pinkyridz  never ONCE said anything about a 'bad beta' - or had a hissy fit over the beta she received. No, she actually bent over backwards to state repeatedly how wonderful Annie was.

BTW: This isn't about whether [info]pinkyridz  can write - this isn't even about betas. This is about how we can so easily be manipulated - how wanks get started and take on lives of their own. It's the internet but we still expect our friends to tell the truth, don't we? Even if we've never met them in our lives.

So, take the above with a grain of salt - after all, who am I? Read the posts yourselves. And all the comments. Heck, you may come to a completely different interpretation that I did but the difference will be that we can then say that we actually READ everything - and THEN made up our own minds.  :) 

The truth is out  there - find it.

 

Tags:

Comments
Page 1 of 2
[1] [2]
caarianna From: [info]caarianna Date: June 8th, 2009 02:40 am (UTC) (Link)
Admirable summary of an incident that was fanned for the sole purpose, I'd suggest, of creating drama. You're right, it's a textbook example of how 'wank' happens, largely because people don't get the facts before commenting, but also because those who have the facts can enjoy the drama that ensues when they're distorted.

I've had a note from damknickers and, though she still plans to step back from the fandom, she indicates she had her eyes opened by Lyn's helpful sharing of Annie's locked posting and, I suspect, the subsequent 'discussion' on riverfox's LJ. She says she feels a whole lot better today.
laurie_ky From: [info]laurie_ky Date: June 8th, 2009 02:59 am (UTC) (Link)
I don't know Annie, Lyn, Riverfox or Annemarie damknickers) but I've read all those posts and I've read all of Annemarie's public journal. I've friended Annemarie, because her nature and personality shine through her posts and I like her. The personality and nature of the other three also are evident to me from their posts. I'm not friending them.

And no matter how much Annemarie tried to set the record straight, the ones twisting the truth kept right on doing it.

You did a good job with summarizing, Aly.

Laurie
mab_browne From: [info]mab_browne Date: June 8th, 2009 03:07 am (UTC) (Link)
Just a comment to say that I agree with your summary and interpretation of events, Aly.
snycock From: [info]snycock Date: June 8th, 2009 03:12 am (UTC) (Link)
This is an excellent summary - and it's a good reminder to actually read and check out things for ourselves. The degree to which Annie and Lyn have twisted the original situation is mind-boggling, I think. But there's no better reply than letting the links speak for themselves.
aerianya From: [info]aerianya Date: June 8th, 2009 03:27 am (UTC) (Link)
I half expected this to turn up on fandomwank.
Unbelievably crass treatment of a fellow human being. Unfortunately not the first time and I'm sure it won't be the last.
I am so very glad not to be a writer in any fandom, but especially that one.

"who am I?" A woman of valor and I'm proud to know you (even if it's only on the internet).
mashfanficchick From: [info]mashfanficchick Date: June 8th, 2009 03:37 am (UTC) (Link)
Well, as long as we're being unpopular (and this WILL be unpopular, even though I do absolutely love both Annie and Lyn), I will say this: all I ever saw of the thing was Annie's first post (because I don't read AM's journal, and because after Annie's first post, I lost interest on the subject...and by her first "post" I mean just that: the first post she made, not any of the comments she left on AM's journal, nor any of the comments people left on hers).

Me entire reaction?

"Seriously, someone's leaving (writing) fandom over an Annie beta? Christ, I'd be freaking THRILLED if she ever beta'd one of my pieces "badly" enough for me to get upset. All I ever get from her are "Great story!" and the occasional missing comma or typo!"

Which, for the record and in lieu of everything you've stated here, makes me think that this whole thing really did most likely get blown way out of proportion solely for the sake of drama.

And now I shall run full-speed away from this post, due to my severe allergy to wank and drama.
kitzen_kat From: [info]kitzen_kat Date: June 8th, 2009 05:57 am (UTC) (Link)
I saw Annie's post on lj and didn't really have time to read it. Hope that people will, nevertheless, continue to write or return to writing when they feel up to it.
fluterbev From: [info]fluterbev Date: June 8th, 2009 06:25 am (UTC) (Link)
The whole drama was built upon a single strawman - Annie's assertion that AM 'trashed' her beta. Yet, as you rightly point out, not only was the beta work Annie did not mentioned at all until Annie brought it up herself in comments, every single time it was mentioned AM was absolutely thankful and complimentary both about the beta and Annie herself.

It boggles my mind that someone would create such a massive drama out of nothing like that. Out of, let's face it, a total lie, which resulted in someone getting so comprehensively stomped on by them and their angry friends. Offering up one of AMs stories for a grudge sporking really finished the job off nicely.



Edited at 2009-06-08 06:26 am (UTC)
starwatcher307 From: [info]starwatcher307 Date: June 8th, 2009 06:26 am (UTC) (Link)
.
Among the many things that blew my mind was, when I told Annie that I consider her a two-faced coward, one of her supporters answered to assert that [a] Annie didn't say anything mean and [b] the OP deserved it anyway, because she's an 'emotional adolescent'.

::boggles:: If [a] is true, [b] can't happen. But, more than that, where is it written that one must 'earn' common courtesy, that you have to meet pre-approved standards of 'good' writing in order not to be a target for certain people's scathing contempt?

Our students start learning that "it's not nice to make fun of other people" in kindergarten. I'd like to see these three sent back for a refresher course.
.
ninja007 From: [info]ninja007 Date: June 8th, 2009 08:23 am (UTC) (Link)
Dear God. Things can sure get out of hand quickly.

This is ONE of the reasons I've backed away from the internet and posting even nicely put critique responses. Things can be taken out of context so easily and blown out of proportion. I only leave nice response if I liked the fic or I don't leave one at all.

It happened to me not long ago and I was lucky another group member stepped up and smoothed ruffled feathers. It could have gotten this bad, very easily.
lit_gal From: [info]lit_gal Date: June 8th, 2009 09:03 pm (UTC) (Link)
And this is kinda sad. I mean, I know I make mistakes--I am dyslexic, and I'll often "swap out" endings, "staked" for "staking" or something equally odd. I cherish those readers who are willing to point out mistakes and help me polish my work. It makes me so sad that good readers are actually scared to make respectable and critical comments.
(no subject) - [info]ninja007 Expand
pattrose From: [info]pattrose Date: June 8th, 2009 08:45 am (UTC) (Link)
I'm honestly in shock after reading your post. I don't even know what to say. I just read Annie's and thought that was how it was. Shows you how much I know. NOTHING. Thanks for pointing this out. Such drama, eh?
roslynsmuse From: [info]roslynsmuse Date: June 8th, 2009 09:32 am (UTC) (Link)
It is good to distinguish between 'wank', the analysis of what is happening and what actually took place. That deserves the name of cyber-bullying and frank discrimination based upon educational achievement in what should be a safe venue for amateurs to come together and enjoy themselves.

Meta does matter when it is based on actual facts such as this summary.
arnie1967 From: [info]arnie1967 Date: June 8th, 2009 08:37 pm (UTC) (Link)
That deserves the name of cyber-bullying

I agree. Reading all the posts was eye-opening.

Thanks for posting this, Aly.
gillyp From: [info]gillyp Date: June 8th, 2009 09:56 am (UTC) (Link)
Well said, a detailed, insightful analysis indeed. It was an astonishing thing to watch unfold, certainly kept me absorbed on a wet Sunday. :o)

It didn't make fandom wank yet? O:!
jessriley From: [info]jessriley Date: June 8th, 2009 10:12 am (UTC) (Link)
Very concise summary and thank you for taking the time to set it all out. I know I've made up my mind.
carlinjona From: [info]carlinjona Date: June 8th, 2009 10:34 am (UTC) (Link)
OMG. I just searched out Riverfox's comments. No matter what a fic is like there is no call for that kind of vicious and hateful treatment. One wonders who told damknickers about it, too. And Riverfox is Joy from the old Feisty Danny archive. Now I'm not surprised about the vindictiveness.

Your interpretation seems quite accurate to me.

It completely boggles me that people have to be like that. There's enough hate in the world without some going out to purposely stir it up. Or is it that they make themselves feel important by belittling others? Very sad.
From: [info]sistermu Date: June 8th, 2009 12:44 pm (UTC) (Link)

This is fascinating

I know a lot of this sort of thing is based on personalities, and let's face it, arguments happen between people all the time. But I wonder how much worse it is made by the distance of the internet, the removal of body language and tone of voice, and the fact that through a friends list, 20, 50, 100 people (so not my friends list *g*) can be instantly informed and invited to weigh in, along with anyone else who happens to be passing. Many of whom delight and putting in their 2c without knowing the full story. I've done it. This is an ugly human trait, I've seen it during my brothers' marital difficulties and divorces. People love to give their advice on situations they know less than half of. Sometimes days afterwards, esp on LJ where the words don't disappear, which is even worse.

That's a pretty obvious point, I know, but it is forgotten sometimes. I can't help wondering how this particular argument would have gone if it had been between a group of four or five friends in a cafe or a front room. Would it have been just as acrimonious or would it have been defused?

I think the removal of body language is the hardest thing, so much of communication (if you're sensitive to the subtleties) is through body language, is it 80%? Also, many people temper their words when they are eye-to-eye. I remember an old advert for the army here in the UK where a tense situation was diffused simply by someone taking off his sunglasses and being open to the other man. (I always remember that when watching SG-1 and the number of times Jack doesn't take of his sunglasses when meeting new people.) I don't think you should write on the internet or in e-mail as you talk because the body language and tone aren't there to help explain your words.

My problem is that I tend to write too formally and I worry that I seem unfriendly. Also, I get carried away in my own thoughts (have you noticed?*g*) and don't always pay close attention to the original person's point or try to divine their feelings. Other people have their own problems of manner.

I really like your analysis here, and I hope it makes people take a step back, not comment until they know the full story, and give other people the benefit of the doubt. It is worth assuming the best of people, if you can, if there's a possibility of misinterpretation. There is enough hurt in the world already.
lamardeuse From: [info]lamardeuse Date: June 8th, 2009 01:29 pm (UTC) (Link)

Re: This is fascinating

I think the distance definitely makes it easier for these types of people to be wantonly cruel without fear of consequences. As for the interpretation difficulties through lack of body language, that's very true, though words like "idiot" and "bitch" are fairly unambiguous no matter what the communication method.
Re: This is fascinating - [info]sistermu Expand
Re: This is fascinating - [info]lamardeuse Expand
Re: This is fascinating - [info]roslynsmuse Expand
Re: This is fascinating - [info]sistermu Expand
Re: This is fascinating - [info]alyburns Expand
Re: This is fascinating - [info]starwatcher307 Expand
Re: This is fascinating - [info]lamardeuse Expand
Re: This is fascinating - [info]arnie1967 Expand
vamysteryfan From: [info]vamysteryfan Date: June 8th, 2009 12:55 pm (UTC) (Link)
Nice to see your concise summary. Now I don't have to go back and read the wank.

I shouldn't find it so amusing, but some people like the drama
lamardeuse From: [info]lamardeuse Date: June 8th, 2009 01:24 pm (UTC) (Link)
So, take the above with a grain of salt - after all, who am I? Read the posts yourselves. And all the comments. Heck, you may come to a completely different interpretation that I did but the difference will be that we can then say that we actually READ everything - and THEN made up our own minds. :)

This. It was all I could do not to shit myself laughing when Lyn pointed me to damknickers' original post as evidence for her completely insane position, because yeah, thanks, already read it. Obviously we are not reading the same language.
sarituss From: [info]sarituss Date: June 8th, 2009 01:54 pm (UTC) (Link)
I too agree with your view of the situation. It really is amazing that some people just don't care if they hurt other people. *unhappy sigh*
knitty_woman From: [info]knitty_woman Date: June 8th, 2009 02:35 pm (UTC) (Link)
Thanks for summing this up, Aly. Thankfully, I don't have a lot of folks on my flist, so I completely missed this. But my feeling is overwhelmingly sad for damnickers, because of her grief about her writing. I remember being a freshman in college and getting a poor grade on my first essay for my writing class. I was devastated when the professor suggested a tutor - I mean, I'd been one of the top writers in my high school, and now I was supposed to get remedial assistance? The tutor assigned to me was a phenomenal writer, much better than I will ever be, and she was so gentle in helping me improve. But I was really shaken to realize that my writing was not where I thought it was, and just how much work it would require to improve it. And, unlike damnickers, I never had a dream of writing. Then to get drawn into this drama ... poor dear. Having said that, I think her final comments to Lyn were cogent and quite well written. I hope she continues to write, at least for herself, and seek out betas who are willing to help her develop her skills.
pinkyridz From: [info]pinkyridz Date: June 8th, 2009 05:13 pm (UTC) (Link)
I truly hope you don't mind me commenting? I will not be personal - I just want to say that thank goodness someone could truly see what was happening. I looked time and time again at my post and saw nothing, in fact my post was purely about ME, no one else, I had no one else in mind, truly.
Some of your comments have really cheered me up today, I can promise you that yesterday was one of the worse day's of my life, humiliation for all the world to see. It was so frustrating not making myself heard, watching others jump to wrong, wrong, wrong - conclusions.
You hit the nail on the head and I am very grateful that someone saw beyond the nastiness characture assasination to see the truth.
Bless you and thank you for sticking your neck out like this - I honestly did not want to be the cause of anything like this!
greenwoman From: [info]greenwoman Date: June 8th, 2009 07:43 pm (UTC) (Link)
I read Aly's post, and then your original post, and then as much of the other links as I could manage.

Disconcerting.

I hope you don't mind a bit more honesty when I say that I can see that you do have some considerable issues when it comes to putting your thoughts into the written word. I can see how that can be daunting to you, and applaud you for seeking out a beta. Your request clearly indicates that you do care about the quality of your work.

I can also see how Annieb1955 would have to had invested considerable work in identifying and offering corrections.

And finally, I can completely understand that the issues that you are facing with your writing might be, in the end, inherent and ingrained enough that you would be overwhelmed by the amount of work it would take both you and a willing beta to bring forth a story with quality presentation as well as content.

What I did not see?

Anything in your original post that:

a) indicated that you didn't care about the quality of your language, spelling, and crafting of your story.
b) indicated that you felt in any way that annieb1955's beta was in any way harsh or otherwise hurtful to you.
c) was in any way intended as a criticism of any kind of annieb1955, or of the role of a beta.

You noted that you treasured a comment from someone who said she did't care about spelling or grammatical errors. I didn't see anything in your mention of that comment indicating that you didn't care about spelling or grammatical errors either; rather, that you appreciated a note of support for the content of your story.

I reread your original post for any evidence of "flouncing" or "drama." I did not find either. What I *did* see was genuine distress at the difficulties you have been having and whether or not you could overcome them, NOT any unwillingness to try, simply a feeling of being overwhelmed. I also saw more distress at the amount of work you had placed on the plate of a willing volunteer, and remorse that you felt too overwhelmed to pursue all that she had offered you in the way of advice.

So, boiled down?

On your part, genuine distress, concern, remorse, and a feeling of being overwhelmed. Geniune apologies ... repeated ... in the face of what you perceive to be your failings.

On the part of annieb1955?

Misunderstanding, followed by overreaction. Which I don't think would have happened had she taken a moment to take a breath, reread with a bit of kindness instead of some drama of her own, and not assume the worst of you.

On the part of others?

Simply people jumping in to support their friend and, in doing so, feeding on her initial negative attitude and becoming more feral.

I understand annieb1955's basic attitude, and agree with many of the comments her supporters left on her lj post. However, in this case I think they are wrong, misinformed, and embarrassingly like a line of lemmings following each other's butts to the cliff, without questioning or even trying to understand what really happened.

I don't know you, damknickers, and I have always respected annieb1955's writing. But sadly, I have lost that respect.

Hang in, and please don't give up writing. Perhaps taking more slowly, do a lot of reading of the work of others you respect and see how they handle grammar, don't trust your spellcheck and read your work with a slow, keen eye.

It sounds as if you already have the hardest part done ... you can tell a story that engages your audience.

Best wishes, and sorry for going on so long....
(no subject) - [info]polly_b Expand
(no subject) - [info]arnie1967 Expand
snailbones From: [info]snailbones Date: June 8th, 2009 06:31 pm (UTC) (Link)


Thanks Aly - should anyone else want to know what happened, you've summed it up beautifully and concisely.

I was appalled at the sheer nastiness of these three women, egging one another on and laughing as they tore into damknickers, behaving like playground bullies. At least in future many more people will know their names and remember their behaviour; they've shown themselves for what they are.

polly_b From: [info]polly_b Date: June 8th, 2009 07:42 pm (UTC) (Link)
Very succinct and factual, Aly, my friend.

*shakes head*

Playground bullies is right.
dowitch From: [info]dowitch Date: June 8th, 2009 11:04 pm (UTC) (Link)

Great Summary

Your post here was incredibly satisfying to read. I did check the links you posted, and am truly gratified to find that you were quite even-handed in your summary. It's always a joy to hear [read] a reasoned, rational, and yet passionate and concerned telling of events. Thank you.

[Well, I'm a little embarrassed. I left this comment, then for some reason thought I was leaving it on the wrong journal, so I deleted it. Then realized this is where I intended to leave it. So here it is, again.]
karieflybabe From: [info]karieflybabe Date: June 8th, 2009 11:29 pm (UTC) (Link)
Aly I think annie took that post down that you quoted from cause I can't find it :(

Well done on this though. You said a lot of what I wanted to say, and of course you said it better.
alyburns From: [info]alyburns Date: June 12th, 2009 12:23 am (UTC) (Link)

I don't know as she took it down, so much

as took certain people OFF of it - it was originally flocked so all she had to do was remove people on the original list. Fortunately, many of us took screenshots.
Re: I don't know as she took it down, so much - [info]karieflybabe Expand
Re: I don't know as she took it down, so much - [info]gillyp Expand
93 comments or Leave a comment
Page 1 of 2
[1] [2]