?

Log in

No account? Create an account
well, I never - alyburns' (aka sideburns & alyjude) Hiding Place
If you spoke faster than David Hewlett you’d travel back in time: Michael Shanks
alyburns
alyburns
well, I never
found out why LJ's script is missing from all pages but my journal itself (nor have I heard from LJ - duh), but at least my journal 'redecoration' efforts are done, holding, and working. I think. Help me out by checking it out and ensuring that the colors are easy on the eyes, especially when commenting (which kept going wonky). The posts themselves should be on white background with black text. *fingers crossed*

PS: BTW, when I'm NOT signed in? The CSS script is there just like normal. It's only when I sign in that all LJ script disappears. Yeah, go figure that one. That should prove it's not my browser. *sigh*

Tags:

10 comments or Leave a comment
Comments
From: karieflybabe Date: February 1st, 2011 02:50 am (UTC) (Link)
New Banner? What happened to Jim/Blair and Jack/Daniel?????

Other than that, looks good.
alyburns From: alyburns Date: February 1st, 2011 03:04 am (UTC) (Link)

I'm working on a full banner

with all four pairings, but it takes so long when I can only work a short time at the computer, so I got my shortcut version up for now, put Blair in the welcome and when I finish the full banner, it will go up *g*
caarianna From: caarianna Date: February 1st, 2011 02:54 am (UTC) (Link)
Still looks wonky to me. Comments are on gray background with black script, easy to read.
alyburns From: alyburns Date: February 1st, 2011 03:02 am (UTC) (Link)

That's correct

for *comments* - and my posts should be on the white background with black text. What still looks wonky?
caarianna From: caarianna Date: February 1st, 2011 03:08 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: That's correct

The print in your post is all jammed together, somewhat overlapping, but it is black on white background.
alyburns From: alyburns Date: February 1st, 2011 03:15 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: That's correct

well, that means another note to LJ support because it doesn't look that way at this end. *sigh* And I'll have to wait to see how many others see it that way. So far, you're the only one *fingers crossed* Maybe it's an Hawaiian thing? LOL!
caarianna From: caarianna Date: February 1st, 2011 03:19 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: That's correct

I think you're right that it's an IE thing.
alyburns From: alyburns Date: February 1st, 2011 03:17 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: That's correct

PS: I think IE that's doing that? When the response comes up for me from Incredimail, it's in IE and my post looked scrunched, but it doesn't from Mozilla.
scherwood From: scherwood Date: February 1st, 2011 05:59 am (UTC) (Link)
everything look ok to me.
bluewolf458 From: bluewolf458 Date: February 1st, 2011 07:26 am (UTC) (Link)
Looks fine to me - using Firefox, not IE.
10 comments or Leave a comment