George always gave us complicated characters - and in Missing Joseph, I saw none of the complicated Lynley that I read and enjoyed. No, Nathanial played him rather sweetly and even the 'take charge' of Havers home was acted out more as a good partner would do, rather than an Earl might do for one of the lower class - and while Havers and Lynley had come a long way by Missing Joseph, Lynley's act, as I remember in the book, was done without thought and as one of the upper-upper class might do. A snap of his fingers and voila - as opposed to giving it a great deal of thought, etc., the way most of us would do for our friends. *shrugs*
Now, unfortunately, while I had season one, episode one at the top of my queue, they somehow sent me episode FOUR of season TWO, which means I missed all the Simon/Deborah/Tommy stuff, the Lady Helen Clyde 'stuff' etc., but I have a good memory, so at least I wasn't puzzled by the "Havers mother' thing or the brief appearance of Helen. Anyway, the actress who plays Havers is spot on and as I imagined her (okay, she's a bit more attractive, but then, that's television for you *G*). But man, it's going to be hard to go backward now. :( But I'll struggle through. :) (Of course, knowing what ultimately happens in the future ain't so easy to deal with either - so maybe it's a good thing that Nathanial is so different? *shrugs*)
Mmm, now I need to check to see if Mystery Theater ever did the Roderick Alleyn mysteries and if they're on DVD too!
Tags: british mysteries, tv